Month: February 2025

Volatility Risk Premium: The Growing Importance of Overnight and Intraday Dynamics

The breakdown of the volatility risk premium into overnight and intraday sessions is an active and emerging area of research. It holds not only academic interest but also practical implications. ETF issuers are launching new ETFs to capitalize on the overnight risk premium, and the shift toward around-the-clock trading could impact the VRP and popular strategies such as covered call writing. In this post, I’ll discuss the VRP breakdown, its implications, impact, and more.

Volatility Risk Premium is a Reward for Bearing Overnight Risk

The volatility risk premium (VRP) represents the difference between the implied volatility of options and the realized volatility of the underlying asset. Reference [1] examines the asymmetry in the VRP. Specifically, it investigates the VRP during the day and overnight sessions. The research was conducted in the Nifty options market, but previous studies in the S&P 500 market reached the same conclusion.

Findings

– There is a significant difference in returns between overnight and intraday short option positions, unrelated to a weekend effect.

– The return asymmetry decreases as option moneyness and maturity increase.

– A systematic relationship exists between day-night option returns and the option Greeks.

– Average post-noon returns are significantly negative for short call positions and positive for short put positions, while pre-noon returns are largely insignificant, indicating that the VRP varies throughout the trading day for calls and puts.

– A significant jump in the underlying index reduces the day-night disparity in option returns due to increased implied volatilities, which boost both intraday and overnight returns.

– Strong positive overnight returns suggest that the VRP in Nifty options prices mainly compensates for overnight risk.

– A strategy of selling index options at the end of the trading day and covering them at the beginning of the next day yields positive returns before transaction costs but is not profitable after accounting for transaction costs.

Reference

[1] Aparna Bhat, Piyush Pandey, S. V. D. Nageswara Rao, The asymmetry in day and night option returns: Evidence from an emerging market, J Futures Markets, 2024, 1–18

Inventory Risk and Its Impact on the Volatility Risk Premium

The previous paper suggests that the VRP is specifically a reward for bearing overnight risk. Reference [2] goes further by attempting to answer why this is the case. It provides an explanation in terms of market makers’ inventory risks, as they hold a net-short position in put options.

Findings

-Put option risk premia are significantly negative overnight when equity exchanges are closed and continuous delta-hedging is not feasible.

-Intraday, when markets are liquid and delta-hedging is possible, put option risk premia align with the risk-free rate.

-Call options show no significant risk premia during the sample period.

-Market makers’ short positions in puts expose them to overnight equity price “gap” risks, while their call option positions are more balanced between long and short, resulting in minimal exposure to gap risk.

-Increased overnight liquidity reduces option risk premia. Regulatory changes and the acquisition of major electronic communication networks in 2006 boosted overnight equity trade volumes from Monday to Friday, reducing the magnitude of weekday option risk premia compared to weekend risk premia.

-The study concludes that the S&P 500 option risk premium arises from a combination of options demand and overnight equity illiquidity.

An interesting implication of this research is that the introduction of around-the-clock trading could potentially reduce the VRP.

Reference

[2] J Terstegge, Intermediary Option Pricing, 2024, Copenhagen Business School

Closing Thoughts

Understanding the breakdown of the volatility risk premium into overnight and intraday components is crucial for both researchers and practitioners. As ETF issuers develop products to leverage the overnight risk premium and markets move toward 24-hour trading, these dynamics could significantly impact volatility strategies. Recognizing these shifts can help investors refine their approaches and adapt to evolving market conditions.

Exploring Credit Risk: Its Influence on Equity Strategies and Risk Management

Credit risk, also known as default risk, is the likelihood of loss when a borrower or counterparty fails to meet its obligations. A lot of research has been conducted on credit risk, and an emerging line of study explores the connection between the equity and credit markets. In this post, we’ll discuss how credit risk impacts investment strategies in the equity market and how equity options can be used to hedge credit risk.

Understanding Credit Risk and Its Impact on Investment Strategies

Credit risk, also known as default risk, is the likelihood of loss from a borrower or counterparty not meeting its obligations. The Merton model, developed by Robert Merton, is a widely used model to measure a company’s credit risk, utilizing quantitative parameters. Reference [1] examined how credit risk impacts momentum and contrarian strategies in the equity markets.

Findings

-Credit risk is measured using default risk, specifically the distance to default (DD) from the Kealhofer, McQuown, and Vasicek (KMV) model.

– High credit risk firms, when subjected to momentum and contrarian strategies, can generate excess returns.

– Medium credit risk firms also offer opportunities for excessive returns with these strategies.

– Low credit risk firms do not show significant relationships with momentum and contrarian returns.

– Investors should consider credit risk when implementing momentum and contrarian investment strategies.

– The applicability of these findings to the US and other developed markets is suggested for further research.

Reference

[1] Ahmed Imran Hunjra, Tahar Tayachi, Rashid Mehmood, Sidra Malik and Zoya Malik, Impact of Credit Risk on Momentum and Contrarian Strategies: Evidence from South Asian Markets, Risks 2020, 8(2), 37

Using Equity Options to Hedge Credit Risks

Using credit derivatives, such as credit default swaps, to manage credit risks is a common practice in the financial industry. Reference [2] proposed an approach that uses equity derivatives to partially hedge credit risks.

The author generalized the Merton structural model, where a company’s equity is viewed as a call option on its assets. However, instead of using the total debt level as the default trigger, the author proposed an alternative default threshold where default is determined by the stock price’s initial crossing of a predefined level. The credit loss then resembles the payoff of a digital put option.

Findings

– Building on Merton’s model, the paper defines default as the event where the stock price ST falls below a set barrier, B.

– By establishing a link between this default model and the probability P(ST < B) at time T, the study shows that hedging with a European put option can reduce the capital required for projected losses.

– An optimization problem is formulated to find the optimal strike price for the put option, minimizing risk based on a specific measure.

– Numerical analysis indicates that this method reduces the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) in both jump and non-jump markets, providing insurance companies with an effective way to reduce losses within their existing risk management structures.

Reference

[2] Constantin Siggelkow, Partial hedging in credit markets with structured derivatives: a quantitative approach using put options, Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies, 2024

Closing Thoughts

Credit risk remains a critical component shaping financial markets, with significant implications for equity investments. The growing research linking credit and equity markets highlights the importance of integrating credit risk considerations into investment strategies. Utilizing equity options for hedging provides a valuable approach to managing these risks effectively. As research in this area evolves, leveraging credit risk insights can enhance portfolio resilience and improve risk-adjusted returns.

Hedging Efficiently: How Optimization Improves Tail Risk Protection

Tail risk hedging aims to protect portfolios from extreme market downturns by using strategies such as out-of-the-money options or volatility products. While effective in mitigating large losses, the challenge lies in balancing cost and long-term returns. In this post, we’ll discuss tail risk hedging and whether it can be done at a reasonable cost.

Tail Risk Hedging Strategies: Are They Effective?

Tail risk hedging involves purchasing put options to protect the portfolio either partially or fully. Reference [1] presents a study of different tail risk hedging strategies. It explores the effectiveness of put option monetization strategies in protecting equity portfolios and enhancing returns.

Findings

– Eight different monetization strategies were applied using S&P 500 put options and the S&P 500 Total Return index from 1996 to 2020.

– Results compared against an unhedged index position and a constant volatility strategy on the same underlying index.

– Tail risk hedging, in this study, yielded inferior results in terms of risk-adjusted and total returns compared to an unhedged index position.

– Over a 25-year period, all strategies’ total returns and Sharpe ratios were worse than the unhedged position.

– Buying puts involves paying for the volatility risk premium, contributing to less favorable results.

– The results are sensitive to choices of time to expiry and moneyness of purchased options in tested strategies.

– The authors suggest the possibility of minimizing hedging costs by optimizing for strikes and maturities.

Reference:

[1] C.V. Bendiksby, MOJ. Eriksson, Tail-Risk Hedging An Empirical Study, Copenhagen Business School

How Can Put Options Be Used in Tail Risk Hedging?

The effectiveness of using put options to hedge the tail risks depends on the cost of acquiring put options, which can eat into investment returns. Reference [2] proposes a mixed risk-return optimization framework for selecting long put options to hedge S&P 500 tail risk. It constructs hypothetical portfolios that continuously roll put options for a tractable formulation.

Findings

– The article discusses the effectiveness of tail risk hedging. It highlights that the premium paid for put options can be substantial, especially when continuously renewing them to maintain protection. This cost can significantly impact investment returns and overall portfolio performance.

– The article introduces an optimization-based approach to tail-risk hedging, using dynamic programming with variance and CVaR as risk measures. This approach involves constructing portfolios that constantly roll over put options, providing protection without losing significant long-term returns.

– Contrary to previous research, the article suggests that an effective tail-risk hedging strategy can be designed using this optimization-based approach, potentially overcoming the drawbacks of traditional protective put strategies.

-The proposed hedging strategy overcame traditional drawbacks of protective put strategies. It outperforms both direct investments in the S&P 500 and static long put option positions.

Reference

[2] Yuehuan He and Roy Kwon, Optimization-based tail risk hedging of the S&P 500 index, THE ENGINEERING ECONOMIST, 2023

Closing Thoughts

Tail risk hedging is expensive. While the first paper demonstrated that tail risk hedging leads to inferior returns, it suggested that results could be improved by optimizing strike prices and maturities. The second paper built on this idea and proposed a hedging scheme based on optimization. The proposed strategy outperforms both direct investments in the S&P 500 and static long put option positions.

Momentum Strategies: Profitability, Predictability, and Risk Management

Momentum strategies have long been a cornerstone of investing, relying on the premise that past winners continue to outperform in the near future. This post explores the effectiveness of momentum strategies, analyzing their ability to generate abnormal returns and assessing their viability in different markets. While previous research has demonstrated the profitability of momentum strategies, recent evidence suggests a decline in return predictability. We then examine how incorporating drawdown control as a risk management tool can enhance performance.

Momentum Trading Strategies Across Capital Markets

Momentum trading is a popular investment strategy. Reference [1] reviewed momentum trading across various markets, from developing to developed countries.

Findings

– The momentum strategy involves investors buying stocks that have shown strong performance, anticipating continued positive performance.

– According to the study, most capital market investors employ the momentum strategy, although its implementation varies.

– This variability suggests inefficiencies in several capital markets’ development.

– The literature review reveals various interpretations and implementations of the momentum strategy.

– Overall, the findings indicate that momentum strategies are prevalent across global capital markets, including both developed and developing countries.

– These strategies typically manifest over the short term, often observed and tested over periods of at least twelve months.

Reference

[1] G. Syamni, Wardhia, D.P. Sari, B. Nafis, A Review of Momentum Strategy in Capital Market, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 495, 2021

Is the Momentum Anomaly Still Present in the Financial Markets?

Reference [2] examined whether the momentum anomaly still exists in the financial markets these days. Specifically, it analyzed the performance of a momentum trading strategy where we determined each asset’s excess return over the past 12 months. If the return is positive, the financial instrument is bought, and if negative, the financial instrument is sold.

Findings

– This paper expands on existing research on trend-following strategies.

– The study confirms the presence of the momentum anomaly during the sample period, showing statistically significant evidence.

– A time series momentum strategy, using the methodology of Moskowitz et al. yields a Sharpe ratio of 0.75, slightly higher than the 0.73 Sharpe ratio from a passive long investment in the same instruments.

– Evidence suggests a decline in return predictability over the past decade, with negative alpha from January 2009 to December 2021 when dividing the sample into three subperiods.

– The decline in return predictability indicates a weakening momentum anomaly.

– Incorporating drawdown control as a risk management measure significantly improves strategy performance, increasing the Sharpe ratio to 1.07 compared to 0.75 without drawdown control.

Reference

[2] David S. Hammerstad and Alf K. Pettersen, The Momentum Anomaly: Can It Still Outperform the Market?, 2022, Department of Finance, BI Norwegian Business School

Closing Thoughts

These studies confirm the relevance of momentum strategies but highlight their declining effectiveness since 2009, suggesting increased market efficiency. While time-series momentum still generates returns, its predictive power has weakened. However, incorporating drawdown control significantly improves performance, making risk management essential for sustaining profitability in evolving market conditions.

The Predictive Power of Dividend Yield in Equity Markets

Dividend yield has long been a cornerstone of equity valuation. In this post, we explore how dividend yield predicts stock returns, its impact on stock volatility, and why it holds unique significance for mature, dividend-paying firms.

Relationship Between Implied Volatility and Dividend Yield

Reference [1] explores the relationship between implied volatility (IV) and dividend yield. It investigates how the dividend yield impacts the implied volatility. The study supports the bird-in-hand theory rather than the dividend irrelevance theory. Results show that there exists a negative relationship between dividend yield and IV, and this relationship is stronger for puts than calls.

Findings

– This thesis examines the link between implied volatility and dividend yield in the options market, comparing the Bird-in-Hand theory and the Dividend Irrelevancy theory.

– Results show that dividend yield significantly impacts implied volatility, with a stronger and consistent negative relationship observed in put options, aligning with the Bird-in-Hand theory.

– The relationship in put options suggests a stronger and more consistent impact of dividend yield, aligning with the Bird-in-hand theory.

– The findings support the hypothesis that an increase in a firm’s dividend yield tends to decrease future volatility.

– This effect was particularly pronounced in put option models but also observed in call option models.

– The study emphasizes the need for alternative methodologies, larger sample sizes, and additional variables to deepen the understanding of option pricing dynamics.

Reference

[1] Jonathan Nestenborg, Gustav Sjöberg, Option Implied Volatility and Dividend Yields, Linnaeus University, 2024

The Impact of Dividend Yield on Stock Performance

Dividend yield is a reliable predictor of future stock returns, particularly during periods of heightened volatility. This article [2] explores the connection between dividend yield, stock volatility, and expected returns.

Findings

– This study shows that dividend yield predicts returns for dividend-paying firms more effectively than alternative pricing factors, challenging previous research.

– Using the most recent declaration date to calculate dividend yield significantly improves return predictability compared to using the trailing yield.

– Asset pricing strategies tend to underperform within mature, profitable firms that pay dividends, highlighting a unique pattern.

– Cross-sectional tests suggest dividend yield predicts returns because investors value receiving dividends rather than as an indicator of future earnings.

– Dividend yield is concluded to be a valuable valuation metric for mature, easier-to-value firms that typically pay dividends.

– Volatility, measured as the trailing twelve-month average of monthly high and low prices, impacts return predictability.

– Excessively volatile prices drive predictability, with dividend yield strategies generating around 1.5% per month.

– During heightened volatility periods, dividend yield strategies yield significant returns.

– Cross-sectionally, dividend yield is a more accurate predictor for returns in volatile firms.

Reference:

[2] Ahn, Seong Jin and Ham, Charles and Kaplan, Zachary and Milbourn, Todd T., Volatility, dividend yield and stock returns (2023). SSRN

Closing Thoughts

Dividend yield is shown to be a useful valuation metric, particularly for mature and easily valued firms that consistently pay dividends. Furthermore, the research emphasizes that investors prioritize the receipt of dividends over their informational value regarding future earnings. These insights reaffirm the importance of dividend yield in understanding market dynamics and developing effective investment strategies.