Month: February 2025

Momentum Strategies: Profitability, Predictability, and Risk Management

Momentum strategies have long been a cornerstone of investing, relying on the premise that past winners continue to outperform in the near future. This post explores the effectiveness of momentum strategies, analyzing their ability to generate abnormal returns and assessing their viability in different markets. While previous research has demonstrated the profitability of momentum strategies, recent evidence suggests a decline in return predictability. We then examine how incorporating drawdown control as a risk management tool can enhance performance.

Momentum Trading Strategies Across Capital Markets

Momentum trading is a popular investment strategy. Reference [1] reviewed momentum trading across various markets, from developing to developed countries.

Findings

– The momentum strategy involves investors buying stocks that have shown strong performance, anticipating continued positive performance.

– According to the study, most capital market investors employ the momentum strategy, although its implementation varies.

– This variability suggests inefficiencies in several capital markets’ development.

– The literature review reveals various interpretations and implementations of the momentum strategy.

– Overall, the findings indicate that momentum strategies are prevalent across global capital markets, including both developed and developing countries.

– These strategies typically manifest over the short term, often observed and tested over periods of at least twelve months.

Reference

[1] G. Syamni, Wardhia, D.P. Sari, B. Nafis, A Review of Momentum Strategy in Capital Market, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 495, 2021

Is the Momentum Anomaly Still Present in the Financial Markets?

Reference [2] examined whether the momentum anomaly still exists in the financial markets these days. Specifically, it analyzed the performance of a momentum trading strategy where we determined each asset’s excess return over the past 12 months. If the return is positive, the financial instrument is bought, and if negative, the financial instrument is sold.

Findings

– This paper expands on existing research on trend-following strategies.

– The study confirms the presence of the momentum anomaly during the sample period, showing statistically significant evidence.

– A time series momentum strategy, using the methodology of Moskowitz et al. yields a Sharpe ratio of 0.75, slightly higher than the 0.73 Sharpe ratio from a passive long investment in the same instruments.

– Evidence suggests a decline in return predictability over the past decade, with negative alpha from January 2009 to December 2021 when dividing the sample into three subperiods.

– The decline in return predictability indicates a weakening momentum anomaly.

– Incorporating drawdown control as a risk management measure significantly improves strategy performance, increasing the Sharpe ratio to 1.07 compared to 0.75 without drawdown control.

Reference

[2] David S. Hammerstad and Alf K. Pettersen, The Momentum Anomaly: Can It Still Outperform the Market?, 2022, Department of Finance, BI Norwegian Business School

Closing Thoughts

These studies confirm the relevance of momentum strategies but highlight their declining effectiveness since 2009, suggesting increased market efficiency. While time-series momentum still generates returns, its predictive power has weakened. However, incorporating drawdown control significantly improves performance, making risk management essential for sustaining profitability in evolving market conditions.

The Predictive Power of Dividend Yield in Equity Markets

Dividend yield has long been a cornerstone of equity valuation. In this post, we explore how dividend yield predicts stock returns, its impact on stock volatility, and why it holds unique significance for mature, dividend-paying firms.

Relationship Between Implied Volatility and Dividend Yield

Reference [1] explores the relationship between implied volatility (IV) and dividend yield. It investigates how the dividend yield impacts the implied volatility. The study supports the bird-in-hand theory rather than the dividend irrelevance theory. Results show that there exists a negative relationship between dividend yield and IV, and this relationship is stronger for puts than calls.

Findings

– This thesis examines the link between implied volatility and dividend yield in the options market, comparing the Bird-in-Hand theory and the Dividend Irrelevancy theory.

– Results show that dividend yield significantly impacts implied volatility, with a stronger and consistent negative relationship observed in put options, aligning with the Bird-in-Hand theory.

– The relationship in put options suggests a stronger and more consistent impact of dividend yield, aligning with the Bird-in-hand theory.

– The findings support the hypothesis that an increase in a firm’s dividend yield tends to decrease future volatility.

– This effect was particularly pronounced in put option models but also observed in call option models.

– The study emphasizes the need for alternative methodologies, larger sample sizes, and additional variables to deepen the understanding of option pricing dynamics.

Reference

[1] Jonathan Nestenborg, Gustav Sjöberg, Option Implied Volatility and Dividend Yields, Linnaeus University, 2024

The Impact of Dividend Yield on Stock Performance

Dividend yield is a reliable predictor of future stock returns, particularly during periods of heightened volatility. This article [2] explores the connection between dividend yield, stock volatility, and expected returns.

Findings

– This study shows that dividend yield predicts returns for dividend-paying firms more effectively than alternative pricing factors, challenging previous research.

– Using the most recent declaration date to calculate dividend yield significantly improves return predictability compared to using the trailing yield.

– Asset pricing strategies tend to underperform within mature, profitable firms that pay dividends, highlighting a unique pattern.

– Cross-sectional tests suggest dividend yield predicts returns because investors value receiving dividends rather than as an indicator of future earnings.

– Dividend yield is concluded to be a valuable valuation metric for mature, easier-to-value firms that typically pay dividends.

– Volatility, measured as the trailing twelve-month average of monthly high and low prices, impacts return predictability.

– Excessively volatile prices drive predictability, with dividend yield strategies generating around 1.5% per month.

– During heightened volatility periods, dividend yield strategies yield significant returns.

– Cross-sectionally, dividend yield is a more accurate predictor for returns in volatile firms.

Reference:

[2] Ahn, Seong Jin and Ham, Charles and Kaplan, Zachary and Milbourn, Todd T., Volatility, dividend yield and stock returns (2023). SSRN

Closing Thoughts

Dividend yield is shown to be a useful valuation metric, particularly for mature and easily valued firms that consistently pay dividends. Furthermore, the research emphasizes that investors prioritize the receipt of dividends over their informational value regarding future earnings. These insights reaffirm the importance of dividend yield in understanding market dynamics and developing effective investment strategies.